Amazon Digital Services Fee Update (FR/IT/ES): How It Works, What It Costs, and What to Do Now
17 March 2026
EU ViDA E-Invoicing Reform: What Amazon Sellers and Cross-Border Merchants Need to Know
17 March 2026
FLEX. Fulfillment
We provide logistics services to online retailers in Europe: Amazon FBA prep, processing FBA removal orders, forwarding to Fulfillment Centers - both FBA and Vendor shipments.
US tariffs on Chinese goods — the Section 301 tariff structure that has been in place since 2018 and that has been extended and expanded through successive US administrations — are reshaping global supply chains in ways that directly affect EU e-commerce sellers and Amazon FBA operators who source from China and sell into the European market. The mechanisms are indirect but consequential: US tariffs do not apply to goods imported into the EU, but they affect EU supply chains through the secondary effects of Chinese export diversion, global container capacity reallocation, component sourcing disruption, and the competitive repositioning of Chinese manufacturers who are simultaneously managing US market access loss and EU regulatory tightening.
For Amazon FBA sellers and cross-border e-commerce operators with European inventory, understanding the five supply chain effects of US tariffs on Chinese goods is not an academic exercise — it is a practical requirement for inventory planning, supplier relationship management, and logistics cost modelling in 2026. The effects play out at different points in the supply chain: some affect the freight market directly, some affect supplier pricing and availability, and some create competitive dynamics on EU marketplaces that change the commercial environment that FBA sellers operate in. Each effect requires a specific operational response that sellers who understand only the tariff mechanics — rather than the supply chain consequences — will miss.
1. Chinese Export Diversion Flooding the EU Market with Redirected Inventory
US tariffs at rates of 25 to 145 percent on Chinese goods across major consumer product categories have made the US market economically inaccessible for a large proportion of Chinese manufacturers whose products were competitive at pre-tariff landed costs but cannot absorb tariff-inclusive costs without price increases that destroy their US market position. The immediate commercial response of Chinese manufacturers and trading companies facing US market closure is export diversion: redirecting the production volume that was destined for the US toward markets where tariffs do not apply — primarily the EU, the UK, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. For EU Amazon FBA sellers and e-commerce operators, Chinese export diversion manifests as increased supply availability of tariff-affected product categories at reduced prices, as Chinese sellers and manufacturers offer aggressive pricing on EU marketplaces to place inventory that cannot go to the US.
The competitive consequence for EU FBA sellers is price compression in categories where Chinese manufacturers are diverting US-bound production to EU channels. A consumer electronics accessory category where Chinese manufacturers were previously shipping 60 percent of production to the US and 40 percent to the EU may shift to 20 percent US and 80 percent EU under high tariff conditions — doubling the supply available on EU marketplaces and generating downward price pressure that reduces margins for all EU sellers in the category. EU FBA sellers whose margin models were calibrated on pre-diversion competitive dynamics will face lower Amazon selling prices and higher advertising costs as the increased Chinese seller presence on EU marketplaces intensifies both price and PPC competition. EU marketplace competitive monitoring for Chinese export diversion signals tracks pricing trends and seller count movements by ASIN category on Amazon EU — identifying the product categories where Chinese export diversion is already generating price compression and the categories where diversion has not yet materialised, allowing sellers to adjust pricing, advertising, and inventory investment decisions ahead of the category competitive shifts that diversion creates.
2. Container Capacity Reallocation Affecting Asia-Europe Freight Availability and Rates
US tariffs reduce Chinese export volumes to the US — which reduces the demand for container shipping capacity on Asia-US-West-Coast and Asia-US-East-Coast trade lanes. Carriers managing vessel deployments across global networks respond to reduced US lane demand by reallocating capacity: vessels previously deployed on trans-Pacific routes are shifted to Asia-Europe, intra-Asia, or Latin America routes where demand is growing as Chinese manufacturers redirect exports toward non-US markets. This capacity reallocation creates asymmetric effects on Asia-Europe freight rates: increased vessel deployment on Asia-Europe lanes increases capacity supply, which exerts downward pressure on base rates; but simultaneously, the Chinese export diversion to EU markets increases cargo demand on the same lanes, partially offsetting the capacity supply increase.
The net effect on Asia-Europe freight rates from US tariff-driven capacity reallocation is difficult to predict precisely because it depends on the magnitude of capacity reallocation relative to the magnitude of demand increase from export diversion — both of which are moving simultaneously in response to the same tariff conditions. What EU FBA sellers can observe operationally is the effect on transit time variability: capacity reallocation from trans-Pacific to Asia-Europe routes changes vessel deployment patterns in ways that affect port rotation schedules, transhipment arrangements, and the predictability of sailing frequency that importers plan around. Asia-Europe freight capacity monitoring under US tariff-driven reallocation tracks available sailing frequency, vessel capacity, and rate trends on active Asia-Europe trade lanes — identifying when US tariff-driven capacity reallocation is improving or degrading the freight market conditions for EU FBA sellers on specific origin-destination pairs, and adjusting inbound shipment scheduling to take advantage of improved capacity availability or buffer against degraded frequency.
3. Component and Raw Material Sourcing Disruption for EU Manufacturers
US tariffs on Chinese intermediate goods — components, raw materials, and semi-finished products that flow from China into global manufacturing supply chains — create sourcing disruptions for EU manufacturers who use Chinese-sourced inputs in products they sell on Amazon EU and through other EU channels. A German electronics manufacturer assembling products in Germany from Chinese-sourced components faces higher component costs when those components are redirected from US-bound to EU-bound supply chains at prices that may include a margin premium as Chinese suppliers respond to increased European demand for the same components. This indirect tariff effect on EU manufacturing costs is distinct from the direct import tariff effect on finished goods: it operates through the component sourcing market rather than through the customs entry of finished products.
For Amazon FBA sellers who source finished goods from EU manufacturers rather than directly from China, US tariff-driven component cost inflation in European manufacturing generates supplier price increases that pass through to the seller's cost of goods — reducing the margin advantage that EU-manufactured products carry relative to Chinese-manufactured alternatives on Amazon EU. The competitive positioning of EU-manufactured Amazon products becomes more complex as US tariffs simultaneously increase the EU manufacturing cost (through component sourcing disruption) and increase the Chinese competition (through export diversion) — narrowing the margin and competitive differentiation that EU-origin products previously enjoyed. EU manufacturer supplier cost monitoring and landed cost impact assessment tracks cost of goods changes from EU manufacturer suppliers against the component sourcing disruption signals that US tariffs generate — identifying when supplier price increases reflect genuine component cost inflation versus margin expansion attempts, and providing the market context that supplier negotiation requires when tariff-driven cost increases are being passed through at rates above what the underlying component cost increase justifies.
4. Supply Chain Restructuring by Chinese Manufacturers Creating Third-Country Origin Complexity
Chinese manufacturers managing US tariff exposure are restructuring supply chains to shift the country of origin of their products from China to countries not subject to US tariffs — principally Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Mexico, and India. This restructuring involves moving final assembly or substantial transformation operations to third countries, generating products whose legal country of origin for US customs purposes is the third country rather than China. For EU FBA sellers sourcing from suppliers who have implemented this restructuring, the country of origin shown on supplier documentation and customs invoices may change from China to Vietnam or Malaysia without any change in the underlying product design, component sourcing, or quality — because the origin change is driven by US tariff compliance rather than by genuine supply chain relocation.
The EU customs implication of Chinese manufacturer origin restructuring is a potential Rules of Origin compliance risk for EU FBA sellers: EU preferential trade agreements with countries like Vietnam (EVFTA) may provide duty relief on goods originating in Vietnam, but the EU's rules of origin for preferential tariff treatment require that the goods undergo sufficient processing in the preference-claiming country — not merely final assembly of Chinese components. If a supplier's Vietnam-origin documentation reflects only final assembly in Vietnam with Chinese components performing the substantial transformation, the goods may not qualify for EVFTA preferential treatment under EU origin rules, and an EU customs audit that identifies the discrepancy can result in denial of the preferential duty rate and recovery of the duty differential. Rules of origin compliance for third-country supplier restructuring reviews the origin documentation for inbound shipments from suppliers who have restructured through third countries — verifying that the country of origin claimed on the commercial invoice and customs declaration is supported by the supplier's manufacturing process evidence, and flagging shipments where the origin claim appears to reflect tariff-driven assembly rather than the substantial transformation that EU preferential origin rules require.
5. EU Retaliatory Tariff Risk and the Transatlantic Trade Policy Uncertainty Premium
US tariffs on goods from the EU — applied under Section 232 on steel and aluminium, threatened under Section 301 investigations into specific EU product categories, and periodically used as leverage in transatlantic trade disputes — create a tariff risk premium that EU manufacturers and e-commerce sellers must factor into their supply chain investment decisions. EU retaliatory tariffs on US goods, and the threat of escalating transatlantic tariff exchanges, affect EU supply chains by raising the cost of US-origin inputs used in EU manufacturing and by creating uncertainty about the tariff treatment of EU goods exported to the US — uncertainty that affects the business case for EU manufacturing capacity investment and the strategic sourcing decisions of EU-based Amazon sellers who export to Amazon US or source from US suppliers.
The transatlantic trade policy uncertainty premium operates as an option value on supply chain flexibility: supply chains that can adapt quickly to tariff changes — by switching between US and non-US component sources, by adjusting product specifications to reduce US-origin content, or by shifting finished goods volumes between the US and EU market channels — are worth more in an environment of trade policy uncertainty than supply chains optimised for the lowest cost under current tariff conditions. For EU FBA sellers building or expanding their supply chain infrastructure, the practical implication is a preference for flexibility over efficiency at the margin: maintaining dual supplier relationships, holding slightly higher safety stocks, and using 3PL fulfillment infrastructure that can route inventory to multiple market destinations rather than single-market-optimised fulfillment that cannot adapt as tariff conditions change. Supply chain flexibility infrastructure for transatlantic trade policy uncertainty provides the Central European fulfillment infrastructure that maximises supply chain flexibility under trade policy uncertainty — receiving inbound shipments from multiple origins, routing inventory to Amazon FBA in Germany and France or to direct-to-consumer channels, and adapting the fulfillment configuration as the transatlantic tariff environment evolves without the infrastructure switching costs that single-market-optimised fulfillment operations generate when tariff conditions require supply chain reconfiguration.
How US Tariffs Create Indirect but Significant Pressure on EU FBA Sellers
The five effects of US tariffs on EU supply chains — Chinese export diversion flooding EU marketplaces, container capacity reallocation affecting Asia-Europe freight, component sourcing disruption for EU manufacturers, third-country origin restructuring creating customs compliance complexity, and transatlantic trade policy uncertainty creating a supply chain flexibility premium — affect EU FBA sellers through mechanisms that are indirect but operationally significant. The sellers who manage these effects most effectively are those who monitor their category competitive dynamics for diversion signals, track Asia-Europe freight capacity changes as trans-Pacific reallocation proceeds, verify supplier origin documentation for restructuring compliance risks, and build supply chain flexibility into their fulfillment infrastructure rather than treating current tariff conditions as a stable planning baseline.
FLEX Fulfillment provides the EU fulfillment infrastructure that supports supply chain adaptability under US tariff pressure: multi-origin inbound receiving for sellers diversifying away from single Chinese supplier dependence, EU pre-stocking that buffers against freight market volatility caused by tariff-driven capacity reallocation, origin documentation review at inbound receipt, and the flexible FBA prep and forwarding infrastructure that routes EU-stocked inventory to Amazon's fulfillment network without the single-origin, single-destination rigidity that tariff environment changes will require sellers to move beyond.
Located in the center of Europe, FLEX Fulfillment provides multi-origin FBA prep, EU pre-stocking, inbound origin documentation review, and flexible fulfillment infrastructure for Amazon sellers managing the supply chain effects of US tariffs on EU e-commerce operations.
Get in touch for a free quote and assessment tailored to your EU fulfillment and supply chain resilience requirements.
